Laura Knight:
Representations of Women
Helen Hoyle
The
early life of the painter Laura Knight was dominated by adversity and
overshadowed by tragedy. Her father abandoned the family shortly before
Laura’s birth in 1877, leaving her mother struggling to support three
young daughters. Both her sisters were sickly, and when Laura was 12 her
middle sister died. Two years later her mother died from cancer, and she
found herself having to provide for herself and her remaining sibling.
Laura somehow took over her mother’s job as an art teacher, convincing
the authorities that she was older than she was.
Shortly afterwards she gained a place to study at Nottingham School of
Art. Here female students were denied access to nude models, having to
make studies instead from plaster casts. Reflecting on this in later
life, Laura felt that this restriction had hampered her progress. It was
at art school that she met her future husband, Harold. He was five years
her senior and Laura, greatly in awe of his technique, used to peer over
his shoulder as he worked, rather to his annoyance. Harold was very
different in temperament from Laura. While she was gregarious and
outspoken, his emotions were inhibited by a strict Victorian upbringing.
This shy and introverted man was a deep thinker who advocated the cause
of pacifism.
After their marriage the couple moved to Staithes on the Yorkshire coast
where they involved themselves in the fishing community, whose
precarious way of life was permeated by tragedy. Their Staithes
paintings documented the harsh lives of the fisher folk. Laura’s
portrayals of women and children seemed to hint at nostalgia for the
lost world of her childhood, which had been abruptly cut short.
In 1907 they decided to move to the south west. For them, the contrast
between the coasts of Yorkshire and
Cornwall
could scarcely have been more dramatic. Here the sun sparkled on an
aquamarine sea bathed in light. Laura had shouldered enormous
responsibility from a young age and had struggled through early
adulthood to forge her career. Newlyn represented a carefree way of life
in which she could relax in the company of like-minded friends and
fellow-artists. Cornwall’s mild climate enabled her to work out of
doors, which she took to with enthusiasm. She became accustomed to
dragging large unwieldy canvases across hostile terrain in order to
obtain the perfect vantage point from which to work. Newlyn had become a
popular holiday destination and her paintings now reflected this lighter
mood, with the sea forming a backdrop to scenes of children playing on
the beach, splashing about in the water or exploring rock pools.
But I believe that it is in her representations of women that Laura
Knight’s best work is to be found. ‘Self and Nude’ is probably her most
well-known painting, and the relationship between the women depicted in
this work was far from conventional. In 1913 the Knights, who had no
children, moved away from Newlyn to the secluded Lamorna valley. Here
they made a number of close friendships, in particular with their
neighbours, Ella and Charles Naper. Ella was a ceramicist and maker of
exquisite jewellery, and the two women collaborated on enamelling
projects. Laura and Harold had drifted apart emotionally and Harold fell
in love with Ella, though there is no evidence of marital infidelity.
Laura encouraged the relationship as it made Harold easier to live with.
Furthermore, she was attracted to Ella’s beauty and gained emotional
sustenance from their friendship. In her autobiography Laura described
Ella as ‘an adorably lovely slim creature, brown as a berry’. The Napers
had a hut on Bodmin Moor which provided a retreat where they would relax
away from social pressures. Often they were accompanied by close friends
such as the Knights, where they would enjoy a bohemian existence,
swimming, sketching and taking photographs.
‘Self
and Nude’ (left) represents a seminal moment in the career of a painter
at the height of her powers – a woman confident enough to risk scandal
by encroaching on the territory of male artistic creativity. She was
perhaps aware that the world was on the brink of a tumultuous upheaval
which would, in the longer term, herald a new era for the status of
women.
The First World War abruptly changed the
lives of the Cornish artistic community. Many young men volunteered for
the trenches. But Harold Knight suffered from poor health, and would
have been eligible for exemption from active service. Despite Laura’s
pleading, he refused to undergo a medical examination. Instead, he
declared that he was a conscientious objector, in the full knowledge
that he would be subjected to a harsh regime of working on the land for
the duration of the war. Laura was furious and it is said that she never
forgave him for this. The tough manual labour affected him physically
and mentally, and he was unable to paint. Those in the local community
who had lost fathers, husbands or sons during the conflict felt betrayed
by Harold’s stance.
The Knights left Cornwall in 1919 to begin a new life in London. Harold
resuscitated his career, becoming a successful portrait painter, while
Laura developed a passion for theatre and ballet. A divergence of
interests was probably inevitable in such an ill-matched couple. Harold
would never be drawn into discussing painting with his wife. He rarely
expressed an opinion on the calibre of Laura’s work, possibly because he
felt threatened by her talent. They never again lived in Cornwall though
Laura often returned, maintaining a close and life-long friendship with
Ella Naper.
Sketches and portraits of performers backstage predominate in her work
of the 1920s. Her relationships with members of the circus suggested an
affinity with those living on the margins of society. Determined to
record every aspect of travelling circus life, Laura accompanied her
friends on tour, adding considerably to her portfolio.
The
high point of her career was her election in 1936, aged 59, as a full
member of the Royal Academy. Laura was only the third woman in history
to attain this honour. This was an extraordinary achievement: even
today, only 10% of RAs are women. By this time she had abandoned her
exploration of the female nude in favour of less controversial subjects,
in keeping with her status as an establishment figure. Her high profile
continued through the years of the Second World War, culminating in a
post-war commission to record the defendants in the Nuremberg Trials of
1946. The result was ‘The Dock (right)’, testament to the painter’s
determination and courage, living through several months in a city
suffering from devastation on an apocalyptic scale.
Harold died in 1961. Now 84, Laura continued working and in 1965 was
rewarded with a major retrospective exhibition at the Royal Academy. By
now she was arguably Britain’s best-known woman artist, and continued to
paint until her death in 1970, at the age of 93. Representational
painting had become a spent force in a post-modern world, and Laura’s
work became virtually forgotten. However, towards the end of the
twentieth century she attracted the attention of feminist art historians
who recognised that some of her images manifested a struggle to assert
her position as a female artist on her own terms. Laura’s
representations of women continue to play a role in feminist art
historical debates.
It is difficult to ascertain what Laura really thought about ‘Self and
Nude’. There is no mention of it in her autobiography of 1936, ‘Oil
Paint and Grease Paint’. Perhaps her reticence on the subject reflected
an unwillingness to engage with emotions associated with memories of her
early married life. ‘Self and Nude’ was purchased by the National
Portrait Gallery and this iconic painting remains one of its most
popular works.
Helen Hoyle's blog is at
http://cornishmuse.blogspot.com |